Comments on: Clustering discussions? http://mla2013.thatcamp.org/01/01/clustering-discussions/ The Humanities and Technology Camp at the Modern Language Association Convention in Boston, January 2013 Wed, 29 Jan 2014 11:02:21 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.9.12 By: guzzettg http://mla2013.thatcamp.org/01/01/clustering-discussions/#comment-2128 Tue, 01 Jan 2013 18:47:21 +0000 http://mla2013.thatcamp.org/?p=329#comment-2128 Yes, I think I was “cautiously” aiming at some mammoth-session, as you say, only I was thinking, more than a full-day concurrently session, say a cluster on “DH as a field” in the morning, and two in the afternoon on “Research Tools” and “Teaching Tools”. But is all open to interpretation, of course.
Also I think this might be helpful in creating Proceedings. But that is another story…
BTW, call me Giorgio please, guzzettg is just a nickname… I thought it was cool at first, but now I am starting to hate it, really. I am slowly moving back to my real name, one login at a time…

]]>
By: Amanda French http://mla2013.thatcamp.org/01/01/clustering-discussions/#comment-2126 Tue, 01 Jan 2013 18:35:25 +0000 http://mla2013.thatcamp.org/?p=329#comment-2126 Great taxonomy, guzzetg. Almost always at THATCamp things are “tracked” so that similar sessions are subsequent instead of simultaneous, so to that extent there’s usually clustering. But do I understand you to be suggesting that we just do (say) 3 mammoth all-day sessions, one on the general topic of “DH as a field,” one on “Teaching tools & tech,” and one on “Research tools & tech”? I’m cautiously interested in that idea.

]]>